User talk:Trade

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11

May 2025 – About the NickRewind YouTube channel

Hello. Not all freely-licensed content from NickRewind is a depiction of a separately copyrighted work or is subject to trademark protection. For example, those templates would be inapplicable for stills of Tom Kenny, Joey Graceffa or any other people from File:Voice Acting Tips with Tom Kenny.webm.
On a related note, I have also created a new tag, {{Free depiction (Nickelodeon)}}, to replace the standard "free depiction" tag for Nickelodeon works. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

when are we actually supposed to use Free depiction (Nickelodeon) Trade (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Free depiction (Nickelodeon)" would be used instead of "Free depiction" for Nickelodeon works. I am currently in the process of swapping the templates. (I did something similar with Cartoon Network a week or so ago.) JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 12:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What about iCarly or Victorious? Trade (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The tag would apply to those too, as they are both Nickelodeon television series. The tag is not limited to just Nicktoons. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever consiiered becoming an reviewer? Trade (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected files:

SergioFLS (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why did you add File:Craig Field.ogv to Category:Videos about manslaughter when it has nothing to do with manslaughter! Suggest you check next time! Bidgee (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Growing Up Creepie Now on Kabillion.webm

Copyright status: File:Growing Up Creepie Now on Kabillion.webm

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Growing Up Creepie Now on Kabillion.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:True Jackson VP Theme Song - First 5 Minutes! Starring Keke Palmer.webm

Copyright status: File:True Jackson VP Theme Song - First 5 Minutes! Starring Keke Palmer.webm

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:True Jackson VP Theme Song - First 5 Minutes! Starring Keke Palmer.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Best Big Time Rush Songs! Boyfriend, Windows Down, - More - NickRewind.webm

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged even though the linked pages have CC BY 4.0 licenses

Hello, I'm very confused by why these two images (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ZeldaVylet.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fish_whisperer.jpg) were tagged as lacking permission. The files were taken directly from Vylet Pony's wiki pages that they own, so I'm not sure why this requires further evidence of permission. Thank you for your time GregariousMadness (talk) 22:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is common practice that we need more verification when someone uploads album covers and similar to Commons, even when the person who uploaded them is the musician themselves

All you have to do is to get Vylet Pony to send an email to commons-copyvio@wikimedia.org and have her confirm that all images listed on her Wiki are released under the CC BY 4.0 license. Trade (talk) 23:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. Their own site, listed as source, is clear about the license. How will VRT make that any clearer? - Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We dont know if he's the album cover artist. VRT would help clear this up Trade (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: @Trade: The problem is that it's quite difficult to contact Vylet Pony themselves... I'm really not sure why the license on their own website isn't sufficient here. They did not create the album artwork, but it belongs to them as they own the rights to the album and everything on it. GregariousMadness (talk) 08:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English_words

English words has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "with red eyes"

I'm sorry, but I'm not understanding the point of the microcategories when the parent gallery is already small. This is just compartmentalizing things to make the categories harder to navigate for users. The category structure on here is already a mess in regards to the cosplay section. Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just because an character have "special" eye color it does not mean that all the cosplayers use colored contact lenses Trade (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not so much the point I'm making Trade, I'm saying doing the character separation in this manner is making the galleries harder to get the proper scope of and adding unnecessary splitting up. Something like "cosplays with red eyes" or similar would work a lot better without disrupting the parent, no?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That only makes it harder to find red eyed cosplay of an specific character Trade (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I feel this is a level of excessiveness. We may as well argue there should be a subcat for Ayane in swimwear, or Reaper without a mask, because "someone may be looking for those". There's a point where "Keep It Simple, Stupid" should apply. D.Va's category mess already shows how out of control that can get as is. There's a reason english user wikipedia editors in the Video Game project complain about the mess that is a lot of the commons categories.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are we not gonna discuss the fact that you marked the categories empty despite it very clearly not being the case? Gives an impression that you cannot be trusted with using the SD template Trade (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to discuss this subject with you, assume good faith. Some categories you've created, such as "Cosplay of Jubilee and Akuma", are literally just...one image. Trying to use bureaucracy isn't going to change that. At least consider my argument.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Threshold_of_originality-related_deletion_requests_in_Albania

Threshold of originality-related deletion requests in Albania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 10:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: careless dog mass catting

1. Back in March 2024 or so, you seem to have moved every image from "Puppies" to "Unidentified puppies". A large portion of these images were in breed categories already, and a good bunch had the breed in the file name. Please do not do such indiscriminate copies/moves in the future. It is not helpful if many of those changes are unneeded and wrong.

2. Around that same time, you copied many images from "Korean Jindo" to "Mixed breed dogs" without any sort of explanation in the Cat-a-lot custom edit reason. While at least one individual dog (the dark red "Cisco") is identified as a NOID East Asian type Spitz at source, this type of edit affected many other images too, and I fail to see any thoroughline in here. Please explain?

--Pitke (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi. I was wondering what you think of Category:Artists by record label since it's similar to the other categories that you've done CfDs for. Anyway, It seems to be meaningless trivia like the other categories but I'm not sure if I want to do a CfD for it or not. So do you have any opinion about it? Adamant1 (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is record label any less relevant for musicians than genre

Might wanna adress that if you wanna DR Trade (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I think it's useful. But, also, Many record labels are rather strongly associated with a style of music (SubPop, Daptone, Okeh) and/or with being a major figure (Deutsche Gramofon, Arista). Also, there is not much risk of cycles (other than the rare cases where a musical artist founds a record label). - Jmabel ! talk 17:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: That's fair. It would be cool if there was at least some kind of standard though so categories like Category:Hot Water Music don't just get spammed with "artist by record label" parent cats regardless if there's actually media related to them or not. 99% of those categories would be totally pointless as parents if we were sticking to the idea that subcats should contain media related to the parents. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daddy's Little Toy cover.webp

File:Daddy's Little Toy cover.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per COM:TOO Australia, this is too complex to be below the threshold of originality in its country

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lua errors

Hi, your Module:Category series navigation in line 1894 calls Module:ConvertNumeric and it's "english_to_ordinal" function. Now that module does not have such function, which is causing issues at Template:Navseasoncats. Can you fix it, or should we just delete unused templates and modules. Jarekt (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:TVs at HUD Played an AI-Generated Video of Donald Trump Kissing Elon Musk's Feet (full).webm

File:TVs at HUD Played an AI-Generated Video of Donald Trump Kissing Elon Musk's Feet (full).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PublicDomainFan08 (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:‘Long Live The Real King’ AI Video Of Trump Kissing Elon Musk’s Feet Reportedly Plays In HUD.webm

File:‘Long Live The Real King’ AI Video Of Trump Kissing Elon Musk’s Feet Reportedly Plays In HUD.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PublicDomainFan08 (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]