Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/10/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
I uploaded it by mistake Christojobyantony (talk) 13:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Christojobyantony (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake QUIET7175 (talk) 01:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Por que me aburre Remolina Faiver (talk) 03:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational purpose FifthFive (talk) 01:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete - clearly intended as vandalism. Omphalographer (talk) 03:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bangaldesh A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel, If I am not mistaken, Copyright Act of 2000 allowed freedom of panorama for architecture in Bangladesh. It’s the new law of September 2023 that does not allow it. New law is not-retroactive (see COM:BANGLADESH#Retroactivity of the laws).
- This file was captured in 2021 and uploaded in 2022. Should we apply new law to old upload even though new law is not-retroactive? আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, the new FOP law is non-retroactive. Image can still be kept,
I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Complete nonsense picture Sonty (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Recht am eigenen Bild: Person ist nicht identifiziert, Bildtext ist wertend Snoopy1964 (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- already tagged speedy as used vor vandalism at de-wiki. --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
бесполезно для образования, отображает насилие 37.110.128.229 08:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Not useful for education displays violence 37.110.128.229 08:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Very useful for education as it clearly depicts a major event in recent American history. As for displaying violence, it only shows the two holding firearms (not actively shooting anyone); it's a hard image, but just because it's shocking/sad doesn't mean it shouldn't be preserved. Jan-Janko (talk) 12:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use on 18 wm projects. --Achim55 (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Rincón de Zhanna (talk) 10:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Replaced by File:Serie Gourmet Ahumados.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.geni.com/people/Ernesto-Pisano-Blanco/6000000090779952984 Yann (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- May be old enough. Yann (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep PD-Chile and PD-US circa 1925 image --RAN (talk) 19:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
AI-generated "unofficial flag" for Estado Falcón in Venezuela. Poorly designed with one white star being on a near-white background. Out of COM:SCOPE if this is not an actual flag of the region. Belbury (talk) 09:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Artificial intelligence is in the public domain as {{PD-algorithm}} but it is my own work (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 10:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Necesito mas información. ¿Estado Falcón tiene una bandera oficial? ¿Es la descripción de la bandera oficial en la pagina por el archivo, y la imagen está diseñada a partir de esa descripción? ¿O esta imagen es una diseño completamente nuevo? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bastique:
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment El Estado Falcón si,pero la que yo pedi para crear la bandera municipal (no oficial) el diseño fue ChatGPT (IA) pero el Municipio San Francisco no tiene bandera (bandera municipal) AbchyZa22 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bastique:look (Category:Flags of municipalities of Falcón) AbchyZa22 (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete Si San Francisco no tiene bandera oficial, esta bandera es ficticia, y por ende está fuera del ámbito de Commons (COM:SCOPE) Rubýñ (Scold) 16:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Estoy de acuerdo, es problema cuando los proyectos usen esta bandera porque parecen oficiales, pero no es cierto.Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bastique:
- Necesito mas información. ¿Estado Falcón tiene una bandera oficial? ¿Es la descripción de la bandera oficial en la pagina por el archivo, y la imagen está diseñada a partir de esa descripción? ¿O esta imagen es una diseño completamente nuevo? Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Unofficial and user-created flags are almost always out of scope, and I see no reason this one would be any different. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete i changed my opinion, you are all right (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, out of scope. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Remove from the title fix NurMi-io (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Tools test NurMi-io (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
AI Image Iiikjjkim (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 20:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Por que me aburre Remolina Faiver (talk) 02:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Por que me aburre Remolina Faiver (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|reason}} Remolina Faiver (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
por que no es mio Remolina Faiver (talk) 02:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Помилково завантажив його як свій власний. NICKOLIKER (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Цей файл я завантажив не переконавшись в тому, що обрізана фотографія не зовсім корректно NICKOLIKER (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Lyvann is cool Jr (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 13:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploader is not an owner of copyrights -Ybsone (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 15:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI image (hardhat, nonsense cables, etc.). Was created to replace the lead image in en:Electrical engineering but is not useful for that task. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This does not meaningfully depict electrical engineering. Omphalographer (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. Bad AI generated images should not be used to illustrate something real, when better real pictures can or symbols can do the job. Dhrm77 (talk) 18:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Municipio San Francisco has no official flag, per the filename and the uploader's statement in this related deletion request (in Spanish). Rubýñ (Scold) 17:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Rubýñ: Comment But the flag (unofficial) is a simple (too simple)? AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a simple flag, but this isn't a copyright issue. This is a scope issue. This flag is fictitious. Rubýñ (Scold) 17:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Rubýñ:Ah ok, Delete I changed my opinion (google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Rubýñ:Ah ok,
- Yes, it's a simple flag, but this isn't a copyright issue. This is a scope issue. This flag is fictitious. Rubýñ (Scold) 17:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Bastique ☎ let's talk! 16:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
por que no es mio Remolina Faiver (talk) 03:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Este archivo fue subido por error y no debería estar disponible públicamente. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remolina Faiver (talk • contribs) 23:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyright violation of https://www.facebook.com/171108823439146/photos/pb.100069696728244.-2207520000/243588476191180/?type=3. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 22:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Невдале фото Calcifeerr (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
I have replaced this image with an identical but higher quality .svg image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poiseuille_flow_linear_neutral_stability_curve.svg Faulty fractal (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Помилково завантажив його як свій власний. NICKOLIKER (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:18, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
The uploader conrfirmed that he was just uploading pics "that had no watermark": https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CalusUse#File:Female_aroused_vs_Male_aroused.jpg PaterMcFly (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- With all due respect, the uploader did not confirm that he was just uploading pics"that had no watermark.I, the uploader stated that I uploaded one image that had no watermark.
- Please see the following statement and resolution of the one image that I was in error for uploading:
- There are no copyright issues with any of my uploads. They are entirely my own work. I own the original digital images. On the 16th of October 2024, it was brought to my attention by "Smooth O" and here is a summary of the resolution:" Smooth O (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "File:Female aroused vs Male aroused.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
- The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)"
- And my answer:
- I was not aware that the image in question was copyrighted.I copied this image from a Russian website and there was no watermark or information leading me to believe that it was not copyrighted.
- Please accept my apologies and if I may ask, help me remove this work from Wikimedia.Thanks CalusUse (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- This upload was the only one that I uploaded not knowing the copyright status. As you can see my error was quickly resolved on the 16th of October..
- Now it appears to me that I'm being scrutinized by claims from other Wiki's that my other contributions may be in violation of copyright infringements.
- Again I state that I had only one contribution that possibly was an infringement and with the direction of "Smooth O" it was successfully removed.
- I trust that my explanation will put this issue behind me. Thanks CalusUse (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC) CalusUse (talk) 11:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn, as uploader confirmed these are his images. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
The uploader conrfirmed that he was just uploading pics "that had no watermark": https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CalusUse#File:Female_aroused_vs_Male_aroused.jpg PaterMcFly (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are no copyright issues with any of my uploads. They are entirely my own work. I own the original digital images. On the 16th of October 2024, it was brought to my attention by "Smooth O" and here is a summary of the resolution:" Smooth O (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "File:Female aroused vs Male aroused.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
- The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)"
- And my answer:
- I was not aware that the image in question was copyrighted.I copied this image from a Russian website and there was no watermark or information leading me to believe that it was not copyrighted.
- Please accept my apologies and if I may ask, help me remove this work from Wikimedia.Thanks CalusUse (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- This upload was the only one that I uploaded not knowing the copyright status. As you can see my error was quickly resolved on the 16th of October..
- Now it appears to me that I'm being scrutinized by claims from other Wiki's that my other contributions may be in violation of copyright infringements.
- Again I state that I had only one contribution that possibly was an infringement and with the direction of "Smooth O" it was successfully removed.
- I trust that my explanation will put this issue behind me. Thanks CalusUse (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
--- Withdrawn, as uploader confirmed these are his images. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
The uploader conrfirmed that he was just uploading pics "that had no watermark": https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CalusUse#File:Female_aroused_vs_Male_aroused.jpg PaterMcFly (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are no copyright issues with any of my uploads. They are entirely my own work. I own the original digital images. On the 16th of October 2024, it was brought to my attention by "Smooth O" and here is a summary of the resolution:" Smooth O (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "File:Female aroused vs Male aroused.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
- The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)"
- And my answer:
- I was not aware that the image in question was copyrighted.I copied this image from a Russian website and there was no watermark or information leading me to believe that it was not copyrighted.
- Please accept my apologies and if I may ask, help me remove this work from Wikimedia.Thanks CalusUse (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- This upload was the only one that I uploaded not knowing the copyright status. As you can see my error was quickly resolved on the 16th of October..
- Now it appears to me that I'm being scrutinized by claims from other Wiki's that my other contributions may be in violation of copyright infringements.
- Again I state that I had only one contribution that possibly was an infringement and with the direction of "Smooth O" it was successfully removed.
- I trust that my explanation will put this issue behind me. Thanks CalusUse (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn, as uploader confirmed these are his images. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
The uploader conrfirmed that he was just uploading pics "that had no watermark": https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CalusUse#File:Female_aroused_vs_Male_aroused.jpg PaterMcFly (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are no copyright issues with any of my uploads. They are entirely my own work. I own the original digital images. On the 16th of October 2024, it was brought to my attention by "Smooth O" and here is a summary of the resolution:" Smooth O (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "File:Female aroused vs Male aroused.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
- The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)"
- And my answer:
- I was not aware that the image in question was copyrighted.I copied this image from a Russian website and there was no watermark or information leading me to believe that it was not copyrighted.
- Please accept my apologies and if I may ask, help me remove this work from Wikimedia.Thanks CalusUse (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- This upload was the only one that I uploaded not knowing the copyright status. As you can see my error was quickly resolved on the 16th of October..
- Now it appears to me that I'm being scrutinized by claims from other Wiki's that my other contributions may be in violation of copyright infringements.
- Again I state that I had only one contribution that possibly was an infringement and with the direction of "Smooth O" it was successfully removed.
- I trust that my explanation will put this issue behind me. Thanks CalusUse (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please update the record. I did have one and only one upload image that may have violated the copyright rules. It was brought to my attention by "Smooth O" and it was successfully removed on 16 October 2024. All of my contributions are mine and I own the original digital images. Thanks, CalusUse (talk) 12:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn, as uploader confirmed these are his images. --PaterMcFly (talk) 05:51, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like a likely web copyvio. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
company logo used for spam article on en: wikipedia. This won't be for reuse. Secretlondon (talk) 14:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anna Craemer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
- File:Contextuelles Identifikationsmodell.jpg
- File:Funktionsweisen des Verstandes.jpg
- File:Contextuelles Urhebermodell.jpg
- File:Contextuelles Transformationsmodell.jpg
- File:Contextuelles Eisbergmodell.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- The materials are meant to help, and do help, and were supposed to be open source. Feel free to delete if you find them questionable. 77.174.48.155 15:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mairairiscabrera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Contexto Baja Edad Media fd5e485ad76e529b08714e37f905ea60.pdf
- File:Trabajo Integrador - Informática Básica.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Julie Key - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia (1963–1991).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Starsapphire2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
- File:Wedding coronation portrait, may 15, 2022.jpg
- File:Dorsetpatentlaura.pdf
- File:Contract.pdf
- File:Princess Royal in Ceremony.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
my personal picture , so that i need to delete, its against my privacy THISISCLOUD (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
my personal picture , so that i need to delete it , its against my privacy THISISCLOUD (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC) {subst:delete2|image=File:Fimosis123.jpg|reason=my personal picture , so that i need to delete it , its against my privacy}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by THISISCLOUD (talk • contribs) 21:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
my personal picture , so that i need to delete, its against my privacy THISISCLOUD (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
my personal picture , so that i need to delete, its against my privacy THISISCLOUD (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo, WP:SCOPE Poliocretes (talk) 06:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, architect César Pelli died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Mortadella42 (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO Tseung Kwan O 唐明街 Tong Ming Street 寶康路 Po Hong Road 富康花園 Beverly Garden Shopping Centre shop 祥興食品批發市場 Cheung Hing Food Supermarket 康師傅 drink bottles July 2022 Px3 01.jpg
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 07:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO Tseung Kwan O 唐明街 Tong Ming Street 寶康路 Po Hong Road 富康花園 Beverly Garden Shopping Centre shop 祥興食品批發市場 Cheung Hing Food Supermarket 康師傅 drink bottles July 2022 Px3 02.jpg
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 07:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/marcusburns1977
[edit]Past discussions about the DeviantArt user https://www.deviantart.com/marcusburns1977 (who seems to be the same person as User:GalaxyNite) have found that some of their images are based on questionable copyright claims (Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2024-06#File:TabukGold.jpg concluded that there was significant doubt that the Deviant Art user actually owns the copyrights to the many images he has posted there
) and that others were videogame screenshots (Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/01/13#File:Pz_III_N.jpg, a screenshot from WarThunder which Burns still falsely claims on DeviantArt to have Created on Blender - modelling & texturing time: 4 days.
).
In Commons:Deletion requests/File:OTs-21.jpg (part of Burns' collection at https://www.deviantart.com/marcusburns1977/art/OTS-21-1022677814), GalaxyNite said they'd generated it themselves with the Midjourney AI but that I was free to nominate it for deletion if I could find earlier media which looked exactly like it - which I could, it was an existing photo which had been slightly edited (the brightness was lowered on the barrel and the magazine was copy and pasted into a loaded position) and then upscaled by AI. Commons:Deletion requests/File:KRISSKARD.jpg was also a minor edit of somebody else's gun artwork, AI-upscaled.
Most uploads in this search are gun and computer-part images have that same AI upscaled look to them. The others are:
- Tank and plane schematics (which may be derived from video games again)
- Black and white scientific footage like File:CloudChamberRadium226.gif and File:ImplosionShapedCharge.gif with no original source specified
- File:Lost Horizons Shangri-La.jpg, described as an own work "oil painting" by Burns but looking like AI, again perhaps from a videogame
- Military photos like File:AIM9AIM7AIM54Intrepid.jpg which Burns claims to have taken aboard an aircraft carrier
- A complex scientific animation at File:LWR Meltdown.gif which Burns claims to have created, but has only uploaded at a very low resolution
Given the problems with this DeviantArt user's perspective on AI upscaling (taking in best faith, a belief that if they find a photo online, alter it slightly and AI upscale it, it becomes an AI-generated image and is no longer subject to copyright) and their false claims about wholly creating images which were actually derivatives of pictures they found online, I think a precautionary delete of all their content from Commons is probably appropriate.
- File:Avtomat fedorov by marcusburns1977.jpg
- File:TITAN RTX SLI.jpg
- File:GTX 295 PlatinumEdition.jpg
- File:AMD Radeon RX 590.png
- File:SIG SAUR MPX.jpg
- File:Daewoo K2C.jpg
- File:AIM120AMRAAM.jpg
- File:Gaming PC set up.jpg
- File:M12S Beretta.jpg
- File:M60MG.jpg
- File:RTX4090 die.jpg
- File:Nuke Briefcase.jpg
- File:Astra400.jpg
- File:RX6900XT.jpg
- File:CR21.jpg
- File:MP412REX.jpg
- File:M39 EMR.jpg
- File:Bergmann Mars.jpg
- File:OTS-21.jpg
- File:Itchaca37.jpg
- File:GTX 480 ASUS.jpg
- File:GM6Lynx.jpg
- File:RPD MachineGun.jpg
- File:Remington model 8.jpg
- File:Tank Variants KV.jpg
- File:Striker Armsel.jpg
- File:CZ805BREN.jpg
- File:GTX 480 PCB.jpg
- File:NVIDIA RTX 4090.jpg
- File:Arsenal Shipka.jpg
- File:8800UltraBSansCooler.jpg
- File:KT PLR16.jpg
- File:Stielhandgranate Bundle.png
- File:RTX 2080FE.png
- File:Chauchat M1915.png
- File:AMD R5700XT.png
- File:QuadroRTX4000.jpg
- File:Beretta M1918.jpg
- File:FNBrowningHP32ndRB.jpg
- File:RSASS.jpg
- File:RX580 Nitro.jpg
- File:QYJ88.jpg
- File:GTXTITANX.jpg
- File:AIM9L.jpg
- File:MP7A1.jpg
- File:WaltherP5.jpg
- File:HK417.jpg
- File:T-34-85-Interior.jpg
- File:GTX780ti.png
- File:TKB022.jpg
- File:Radeon HD 5970.jpg
- File:TKB408.jpg
- File:OTs-02 Kiparis.jpg
- File:M1216SRM.jpg
- File:FAMASF1Felin.jpg
- File:RTX 4060 LP.jpg
- File:GTX TITAN Z.jpg
- File:Panzerfaust 60.jpg
- File:OTS-14 Groza.jpg
- File:CloudChamberRadium226.gif
- File:MaximGun.jpg
- File:Daewoo K7.jpg
- File:F4E Schematic Drawing.jpg
- File:No.3 Revolver CH.png
- File:RTX2080PCB.jpg
- File:CZ Scorpion Evo 3.jpg
- File:Howell Automatic Rifle.png
- File:GTX690 Die.jpg
- File:Kel-Tec KSG.jpg
- File:M39EMR.jpg
- File:Coach Gun DoubleBarrel.jpg
- File:XM312.jpg
- File:9800GX2.jpg
- File:8800Ultra.jpg
- File:AIM9AIM7AIM54Intrepid.jpg
- File:GTX1080tiMSI.jpg
- File:AK47GoldIraq.jpg
- File:GTX480 in pc.jpg
- File:HD 7870 Crossfire.jpg
- File:GTX 590 Cooler.jpg
- File:Type 73 light machine gun.jpg
- File:LMG0818.jpg
- File:Owen Gun.jpg
- File:MiG19VVSDisplay.jpg
- File:T5000.jpg
- File:Heavy Tanks Evolution USSR.jpg
- File:AUROS ITX AMD.jpg
- File:ImplosionShapedCharge.gif
- File:Pedersondevice.jpg
- File:GTX690 SLI.jpg
- File:Mark IV Tankfest 2016.jpg
- File:Gigabyte GV-N690D5-4GD-B 20221029.jpg
- File:Huot Automatic Rifle.jpg
- File:GTX1080TiUnderside.png
- File:MG15 7.92mm.jpg
- File:Intel LGA 1700 Mini ITX.jpg
- File:GTX295.jpg
- File:GTX1080ti.png
- File:PTRD41.jpg
- File:Gtx 590.jpg
- File:RPK 45 box magazine sides.png
- File:AIM-54C.jpg
- File:F35Schematic.jpg
- File:HKG11K2.jpg
- File:Milkor MGL.jpg
- File:NV7100GS.jpg
- File:GTX 690 Die.jpg
- File:9800GX2 in pc.jpg
- File:GrizzlyBigBoar.jpg
- File:RTX4090 FE PCB and die.jpg
- File:CCRadonGas.gif
- File:TitanXP.jpg
- File:MSI Aegis X.jpg
- File:CloudChamberThoriumRod.gif
- File:H&K G36 Variants.jpg
- File:Lost Horizons Shangri-La.jpg
- File:GeForce GTX 780 Ti SLI on ASRock Z77 Extreme6 20220427.png
- File:Fusil Automatique Modèle 1917.png
- File:Boeing EA-18G Schematics.jpg
- File:ST Kinetics CPW.jpg
- File:LWR Meltdown.gif
- File:FAMAS F1 G 2.png
Belbury (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Some images look like downsized stripped versions of professional photographs --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Which is still a copyright violation. Even if we supposed a 2000x1000 downscale would be fair use (dubious, especially if the claim by the user below is correct, which would mean that non-encumbered images are available: "This user, using a second account, has edited many Wikipedia articles to delete appropriately licensed images, some of which have been in place for more than a decade, and replaced them with these questionable images."), Commons is not for fair use media. Phiarc (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per the precautionary principle. Delete ASAP. 2003:D6:C726:DE89:798B:3CB5:85A2:1953 11:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- The files relating to cloud chambers uploaded by the user (e.g.CloudChamberRadium226.gif) are derived from a video by YouTube channel CloudyLabs Radioactive sources in a cloud chamber. This and similar videos by CloudyLabs have been used on various news/media sites, consistently credited to CloudyLabs CloudyLabs Videos in the Media, an organisation run by a French engineer building cloud chambers for science education. This source is not indicated in the file descriptions, instead the source given are a files by Deviantart user “MarcusBurns1977”, which do not refer to or credit CloudyLabs and seems unlikely to have any affiliation with CloudyLabs. The CloudyLabs YouTube channel and website have a generic copyright statement but nothing regarding CC licensing as far as I could see. Jôanes (talk) 20:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This user, using a second account, has edited many Wikipedia articles to delete appropriately licensed images, some of which have been in place for more than a decade, and replaced them with these questionable images. This is suspicious behavior which suggests that the user is not operating in good faith, and that these images should be deleted immediately. 76.24.25.153 16:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/marcusburns1977
[edit]Two files missed during the previous nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marcusburns1977 - a deviantart.com user with a history of falsely publishing edited photos as own work.
Belbury (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete same as it ever was Phiarc (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ClaudiaHusser (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
- File:Georges Gravel Picard.jpg
- File:Contract de permission 1838 signé par Georges Gravel..png
- File:Georges Gravelbourg84.png
- File:Georges Gravelbourg45.png
- File:Georges Gravelbourg7.jpg
- File:Georges Gravelbourg4.jpg
- File:Georges Gravelbourg3.jpg
- File:Georges Gravelbourg 2.jpg
- File:Georges Gravelbourg.png
- File:BasketBall (2).png
- File:Thymého Tbomwinkelemeïer5.png
- File:Thymého Tbomwinkelemeïer1.png
- File:Thymého Tbomwinkelemeïer.jpg
- File:Thymého TBom Husser (3).jpg
- File:Thymého TBom Husser.jpg
- File:Thymého T-Bom Husser.jpg
- File:Thymého.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jesuloluwa Adelekan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Assorted sculptural works, made during 1960–80 as per this. Unfortunately, Nigeria has abolished Freedom of Panorama since March 2023, so new uploads are no longer allowed, and these images are now infringing the sculptors' copyrights. Assuming the artists remain unknown, Nigerian copyright for the oldest of the sculptures expires in around 2030 or later, but for sculptures made before 1978, due to the U.S. copyright provided by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the files of the 1960–1977 sculptures will not be restored even if those fall out of copyright in Nigeria, until around 2056–2073 (95+1 years after the publication of the statue). The longer U.S. URAA terms may only be ignored if Nigeria had valid FoP, which isn't in this case. Majority of the images are submissions under Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 – Nigerian edition.
- File:Osun olomo yoyo.jpg
- File:Osun courtyard enterance.jpg
- File:Osun devotee.jpg
- File:Oga (Chameleon).jpg
- File:Ojubo osun.jpg
- File:Obaluaje sanpona (god of chicken pox).jpg
- File:Lajomi with child exposed.jpg
- File:Iya mopo.jpg
- File:Lajomi with child covered.jpg
- File:Eye Iya mopo to je Atioro.jpg
- File:Iya ilu bata.jpg
- File:Iya ibeji osun 2.jpg
- File:Iya ibeji Osun.jpg
- File:Igbo ifa entrance.jpg
- File:Ile yemoo (iyana arugba).jpg
- File:Igunnugun (Vulture).jpg
- File:Idi egbe.jpg
- File:Esu odo.jpg
- File:Emele bata oloju meta.jpg
- File:Eegungun oba opele iba pa elepo.jpg
- File:Eegungun labuata.jpg
- File:Ela statue.jpg
- File:Eegungun apaje pa olobi.jpg
- File:16 point lamp.jpg
- File:Eegungun komaloolu.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 23:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
This is a screencap of an interview in a promo created by Shen Yun, not the author's own work (source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up-dfbIeBIc) 134.69.7.1 06:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
This is this uploader's contact card, containing links to their website, email, phone, LinkedIn, Telegram, VK, Discord, Facebook, Instagram, GitHub, GitLab, Reddit, Wikipedia, Pinterest, last.fm, and StackExchange. They added it to w:vCard, but I removed it as it appears promotional. Given that it's not used anywhere else, I don't see a particular reason to retain the file. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, that's promotional. We wouldn't accept an image consisting of the same information as text; representing it as a QR code shouldn't change that. Omphalographer (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
As the person who extracted it, I no longer want this file to exist Zzzs (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Por que me aburre; no es mio; Este archivo fue subido por error y no debería estar disponible públicamente. Remolina Faiver (talk) 03:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image, uploaded for a promotional artilce (now deleted) on enwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as out-of-scope, no foreseeable educational use. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 23:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Replaced in ru:Многозначная логика with TeX equivalent:
_Municipio_San_Francisco,_Estado_Falc%C3%B3n_(AI).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Municipio_San_Francisco,_Estado_Falc%C3%B3n_(AI).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Municipio_San_Francisco,_Estado_Falcón_(AI).jpg){kind=link}
_Municipio_San_Francisco,_Estado_Falcón_(AI).jpg){kind=link}
_Municipio_Aut%C3%B3nomo_San_Francisco,Estado_Falc%C3%B3n_(AI).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Municipio_Aut%C3%B3nomo_San_Francisco,Estado_Falc%C3%B3n_(AI).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 10:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
used for self promo --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, Велика Лука.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1974. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, село Мишковичі (Тернопільський район).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1975. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No permission from Facebook, anonymous work can also be copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused photo of unexplained object. Description not helpful. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 07:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Unused out of photo of miscellaneous equipment without clear purpose. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr Ars et historia de Patria Bosnia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are from official website of National Theater in Sarajevo © (link). Permission is needed.
- File:Nasl1662914512-001-opera-hasanaginica-photo-sulejman-omerbasic-performances.jpg
- File:1662914514-077-opera-hasanaginica-photo-sulejman-omerbasic-performances.jpg
- File:1662914515-007-opera-hasanaginica-photo-sulejman-omerbasic-performances.jpg
- File:Pozoriste2012052714292004.jpg
- File:Hasanaginica stara.jpg
- File:Hasanaginica pp 3.jpg
- File:Hasanaginica opera pp.jpg
- File:Scena opere Hasanaginica.jpg
- File:Hasanaginica pp 2.jpg
- File:Hasanaginica opera.jpg
- File:Scena opere.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 07:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: this looks like a joke copied from Reddit, not an actual pride flag. Omphalographer (talk) 07:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Screenshot of a YT video. We need the source to confirm that its freely licensed Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as copyright violation. Looks like this is a screengrab from this Twitch stream. No indication of free licensing. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricmicholofrede (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsensical, unused recent uploads of File:Leroy Merlin.svg 19 times, not necessary
- File:Freedeomalolo.png
- File:Fraaawebfrfr.png
- File:Sexdfreeddefre.png
- File:Sexdfreed.png
- File:Deffffdeededeee.png
- File:Maillerfreewebfr.png
- File:Ffffiflololo.png
- File:Defreferferf.png
- File:Frreewebfreede.png
- File:Frreewebfreededee.png
- File:Frreewebfreedede.png
- File:Frreewebfreedee.png
- File:Frreewebfree.png
- File:Freewebfreee.png
- File:Freewebdo.png
- File:Frededdede.png
- File:Freewebfr.png
- File:Imagesfreee.png
- File:Lery Mer.png
Nutshinou Talk! 21:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricmicholofrede (talk · contribs)
[edit]All unused, unnecessary smaller versions of File:Freeweb.png
- File:Toumpoufreeee.png
- File:Versionlogindrr.png
- File:Loginfreedee.png
- File:Loabafrlodelofr.png
- File:Mailllersistflogoin.png
- File:Nononono.png
- File:Zizkzikikii.png
- File:Favilafrchlolo.png
- File:Frewebgt.png
Nutshinou Talk! 21:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricmicholofrede (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various other logos and miscellaneous images with nonsense filenames. This all seems rather suspicious.
- File:Fredeomade.png
- File:Freeweb.png
- File:Freedemoolo.png
- File:Demonfreee.png
- File:AAA-FREE.png
- File:Mailinfr.png
- File:Aawtfrdede.png
- File:Frdeeeomloo.png
- File:Defrefreferf.png
- File:Freewebfrlo.png
- File:Fredededelooo.png
- File:Frechwebfr.png
- File:Spaysfoukoa.png
- File:Freewebgtafr.png
- File:Poustafree.png
- File:Defrrrfrdeee.png
- File:Defrefeferfer.png
- File:FredeeeFRFR.png
- File:Fredeeeomlooo.png
- File:Defrfrfrfr.png
Omphalographer (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- While I agree that those file names are bad, what exactly is the reason for deletion here? File:Fredeomade.png and File:Freeweb.png are the logos of Italian store chains (see Conad and Esselunga). File:Demonfreee.png is the logo of a German supermarket chain (see Lidl). File:Frdeeeomloo.png is the Netflix logo. Just to name a few. What about them is out of scope? They all might fall under PD-text / text logo. Nakonana (talk) 18:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- If some of these are logos which we don't already have images of, and which are truly freely licensed (unlikely) or not above TOO in the applicable country (needs research), please request a rename for those files and strike them from the nomination. As it stands, though, the names are useless, a bunch of the files are duplicates with modifications which make them unsuitable for use (e.g. the five small dots in the upper left of File:FredeeeFRFR.png), and the license status of these images is unclear. Omphalographer (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricmicholofrede (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: one more unused logo with a nonsense filename.
Omphalographer (talk) 00:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patricmicholofrede (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: two more logos with nonsense filenames. Uploader has been blocked.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 09:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Image looks like a screenshot from this video, that's credited as "Credit: ESA/STFC RAL Space/UCL/UK Space Agency/ ATG Medialab", and not CC-BY-SA-4.0 Artem.G (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Scriba56 (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Krd 13:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Scriba56 (talk) 12:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Ahmed Talib House (1975)
[edit]There is no more valid Freedom of Panorama in Nigeroa since March 2023, so new commercially-licensed uploads are infringements to artists' copyrights. The building was built in 1975 and authored by architectural firm A.F. Partnership. Commercial Creative Commons licensing permission from the architectural firm is required; failing that, undelete in January 1, 2046 (1975+70+1).
- File:Ahmed Talib House, Kaduna in foreview.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 01.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 02.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 03.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 04.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 05.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 06.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 07.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 08.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 09.jpg
- File:Ahmed Talip House (10-story), Kaduna 10.jpg
- File:Bike passing by Ahmed Talib House (10 Storey), Kaduna.jpg
- File:Road crossing by Ahmed Talib House, Kaduna.jpg
,_Kaduna_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Kaduna.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 23:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Kambai Akau, the uploader of some images, incorrectly commented on their talk page (incorrect since they are supposed to contest the deletion request here, not on their talk page). Responding to their question
- "But what about if the license is changed to a non-commercial one?" – no, per COM:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, commercial use should always be allowed, even without architect's permission. If non-commercial use is only permitted, especially with the now restrictive Nigerian FoP that no longer allows photographs of copyrighted public artworks to be freely shared and distributed (without permissions from architects or sculptors), we cannot accept this building as well as other copyrighted architecture and monuments from Nigeria, not just those from the city of Kaduna. A possible option is to contact A.F. Partnership and ask if they are willing to have all images of the building they authored licensed under commercial Creative Commons licensing. Non-commercial licenses are forbidden; see {{Noncommercial}} which is a redirect to a speedy deletion template.
- JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 00:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Friday musa: (responding to your reply on your talk page). There is no provision in your country's copyright law that exempts public property works from copyright. In fact, government works are protected for 70 years from publication, but this is somehow irrelevant considering they are not the designers (a source I visited, given by the link above, provides the name of the architecture firm who authored the building).
- Under Nigerian copyright act, architecture and public art like sculptures are included as copyrightable objects. Since these are post-March 2023 uploads, they are no longer OK to be hosted here due to the restrictive Freedom of Panorama in the new law, only giving the free use of public artistic works rights to broadcasts or audio-visual media. This obviously excludes photographs. Copyright for this building lasts for 70+1 years after 1975 (since this is a corporate work and not a work of an architect alone), so these files can only be restored (undeleted) on January 1, 2046. It may be too long, but without Wikimedia-suitable FoP in Nigeria, we cannot host these images earlier than 2046. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 13:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Prince Olofin Atekoye monument (2017)
[edit]There is no valid Freedom of Panorama in Nigeria since March 2023, so these images are now infringing sculptural copyrights. This source tells us that the statue was unveiled in 2017, so the sculptor is likely still alive and the monument cannot be used in conmercially-licensed images.
- File:Olofin Atekoye statue back view.jpg
- File:Olofin Atekoye statue front view.jpg
- File:Olofin Atekoye statue side view.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 23:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Stuffed toy in South Africa house. Something to do with football as he's holding one. Yes, I know, the world cup, yawn.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Business Centers in Downtown Dubai Finding the Perfect Low-Cost Space for Your Startup.jpg
[edit]
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Unreasonable conformation. Category:Ketamine (and its subcats) have crystal structure of free-base and from •HCl salt. DMacks (talk) 05:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright infringement, considering France not permitting commercial Freedom of Panorama. Still under Architect Zaha Hadid's posthumous copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tour CMA-CGM. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
This text is too creative, fails {{PD-text}}, and infringes the text author's copyright. No Freedom of Panorama for texts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused image with just black background. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
used for self promo --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 16:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a photo. Even if it's the uploader's own photo (which needs to be made clear), the photo editor UI elements make this file unusable, so it's out of COM:SCOPE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Needs permission if deemed above COM:TOO Turkmenistan which doesn't exist. Jonteemil (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Displayed text doesn't appear to be covered by CC license. Photograph is also small-ish and EXIF is from Photoshop. Abzeronow (talk) 21:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:NUDE Commons is not a private amateur porn site Poliocretes (talk) 06:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:36, 4 November 2024 UTC: No permission since 27 October 2024 --Krdbot 07:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
COM:NUDE Commons is not a private amateur porn site Poliocretes (talk) 06:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 05:36, 4 November 2024 UTC: No permission since 27 October 2024 --Krdbot 07:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Denmark, artist John Moray-Smith died in 1958 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Norwich is in England! 3D works are OK in the UK. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
The copyright is attributed to ISIS 80.147.192.66 02:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Previously published at https://m.klaipeda.diena.lt/naujienos/verslas/imoniu-pulsas/greiciau-tiksliau-ir-pigiau-cili-pizza-idiege-nauja-skaitmenini-sprendima-1190742, no evidence that this is the uploader's work Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
![12:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/10/17#c-Adeletron_3030-20241017124400-File:,,Čili_Pizza"_Didžioji_g._5.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
![19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/10/17#c-Ymblanter-20241114192400-File:,,Čili_Pizza"_Didžioji_g._5.jpg){kind=link}
_(2791181761).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2791181761).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photograph of three non-notable women. This seems out of scope to me. —holly {chat} 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
_(2791181761).jpg){kind=link}
- I agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
_(2791181761).jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio - https://dietagespresse.com/ - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused and poor quality CottonDuggan (talk) 22:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
It's pretty unlikely this is the uploader's own work and it's clearly copyrighted since it was taken in 1960. So the file should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 03:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chebbupell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unidentified AI-generated emblems. Related article ru:Тайные общества и ордена was speedily deleted.
xbfh.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 03:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Title said "Video Capture", which means this file is capture from a video with unknown copyright status, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyright violation and obviously not the uploader's own work, see the prior discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:GAJAPTI EMPIRE.jpg which resulted in the deletion of an essentially identical map. Brusquedandelion (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Comprehensivegrowthsolutions (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work. Mix of posters and photos with watermark, none of which have exif.
- File:Iaro Razanakoto B Quick Absolute Racing.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Thailand Supercar GT4 Victory.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Bangsaen GP Flyer 2024.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Thailand Supercar GT4.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto B Quick Racing.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Racing Victory 2022.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Buriram International Circuit Thailand 2022.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Buriram International Circuit Thailand 2021.jpg
- File:Bou PT Racing 2022 Flyer.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto Bangsaen GP Thailand 2021.jpg
- File:Bou PT Racing Victory.jpg
- File:Iaro Razanakoto.jpg
- File:Bou 88 Racing 2020.jpg
- File:Bou 88 Victory with MRA Racing Team.jpg
- File:Iaro-Razanakoto-88-Racing.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Gbawden, Iaro Razanakoto needs these photos uploaded for his page that is waiting to be published. How to proceed with getting the photos he needs uploaded. How will you know which ones either him and I took, or a friend, or an employee? Comprehensivegrowthsolutions (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
COM:Derivative work: photograph-of-photograph (picture of a screen). Original source and author unknown. MKFI (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
poor quality Savi5439 (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is essentially a COM:GCSD G7 "Author or uploader request deletion". Uploader seems to have intended to replace File:Red Mill, Clinton.jpg with the subsequently-uploaded File:Red Mill, - Clinton, NJ.jpg, but did not notice the "Upload a new version of this file" link. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7, and superseded as noted above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
No use, no educational value
InternetowyGołąb (talk) 13:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
The image was overtaken by a better one PancoPinco (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no author no permission, used for promotion on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bo author no permission protected logo copyvio from https://www.kvbe.nl/ Hoyanova (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry image, nothing an be seen clearly A1Cafel (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No explicit license is mentioned on this particular page. 178.151.134.244 16:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Thomas Lerch - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Thomas Lerch - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is certainly not uploader Debora's "own work", it's a film still from this movie by living film director Gertrud Pinkus used for the Solothurn Film Festival, presumably we would need a VRT permission by Pinkus. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/201240123@N05
[edit]Likely COM:FLICKRWASH. A Google Lens search on each photo returns results that predate the Flickr upload, while File:Dream Within a Dream Tour (Oops!... I Did It Again).jpg from the same account, sourced to https://www.flickr.com/photos/201240123@N05/54004343172/, is a Shutterstock photo.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. First image was previously published at [1], second at [2], third at [3]. Omphalographer (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays 🗣 19:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, all over the internet. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
poor quality, JPG, unused version of File:San Lorenzo Nuovo-Stemma.svg Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Despite a claim of "own work", this seems to be a screenshot from the film Dead Innocent, so I expect it's actually a copyright violation. bjh21 (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
These were apparently uploaded to support a draft article at en.wikipedia which was speedy deleted because it was a copyright violation of the butcherblocksauces.com website with no evidence of permission:- [4]
I've checked more than half the images here via Google Images and/or Tineye (including both of the archive photos), and they all point to butcherblocksauces.com as the source. There's no evidence of permission or that the uploader has any official connection with the site, and in the absence of that, this is a sufficiently strong case of PCP to warrant deletion for all images.
- File:Joseph and Rosemarie Frazzica Foodmart Rd Boston, MA.jpg
- File:Joseph Frazzica The Butcher Block Peabody, MA.jpg
- File:BBS Rib Sauce.jpg
- File:BBS Teriyaki Sauce Item Master.png
- File:BBSST.png
- File:BBS Rib H&S E-Commerce Image 150x150.png
- File:Butcher Block Sauces Barbeque Sauce 150x150.png
- File:BBS Sesame.png
- File:Butcher Block Sauces Teriyaki Sauce 150x150.png
- File:BBS Rib H&S 150x150.png
- File:Butcher Block Sauces Hot & Spicy Rib Sauce 200x200.png
- File:Butcher Block Sauces Rib Sauce 150x150.png
Ubcule (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and uploaded for promotional purposes, advertising, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"Own work" claimed, but this looks like a video screenshot, and hence a copyright violation. bjh21 (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This looks like a film or video screenshot, and not "own work" as claimed. Thus, it is likely to be a copyright violation. bjh21 (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
_.PNG){kind=link}
_.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low resolution duplicate of File:Picture with White Lines (Kandinsky, 1913).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
_.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
_.PNG){kind=link}
Purportedy "Own work" from 2023, but it's a photo of a locomotive of the en:Wisbech and Upwell Tramway, which closed in 1966. TinEye finds that this picture was on the Thomas the Tank Engine Wiki in 2014[5]. I don't know where it came from originally, but I doubt the photo was taken by Mike00 classics and think it's probably a copyright violation. bjh21 (talk) 22:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: picture available in 2009 according to TinEye, A copyright appears on the bottom right of the picture, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Claimed as "own work" and dated 2023, but appears to be a copy of this photo: https://travelandmixpix.smugmug.com/Rail/Steam/Glasgow/i-PQbGj6V/A. That source credits it to "BKB Green Collection" and dates it to 1935, which isn't old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. I think it's most likely a copyright violation. bjh21 (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
wrong licence, source says "Credit: DLR (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)" Artem.G (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- same for File:Test model of MMX rover detail.jpg, File:The MMX rover moving on Phobos.jpg, and File:The MMX rover moving on Phobos (cropped).jpg. Artem.G (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I contest the deletion request, it was released under a free license at the time of import, then the DLR changed license. Please don't delete the files. vip (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This appears to be accurate; the archived page at [6] has the images clearly marked as "CC-BY 3.0". Omphalographer (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep all. I'm adding a link to the archived page to each. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: CC licences aren't revocable. --Stifle (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Creative work, almost certainly modern made, uploaded in 2006 by now-banned sock on enwiki Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Picture taken from Google StreetView Öffis Graz (talk) 17:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, watermark clearly visible behind the bus ~TheImaCow (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
The copyright is attributed to ISIS Kakao88 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Screenshot from the ISIS video. Solodkih (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. What is the proof that this image is from an ISIS video? Image released under a valid license. Tan Khaerr (talk) 07:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The license is fake. Qasioun News Agency is not the author of the file. The author is ISIS https://www.nbcnews.com/video/isis-shows-off-military-hardware-294035523889. Soulr8 (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. What is the proof that this image is from an ISIS video? Image released under a valid license. Tan Khaerr (talk) 07:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Italy, architect César Pelli died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep Come on! A shadow?! We're clearly under the high italian ToO IMHO, a shadow of a building is not copyrighted...
- As for the Unicredit Tower, we can see here practically only glass, without the category we wouldn't even understand which building is, it could literally be any skyscraper in the world, we are IMHO under the ToO too. Friniate (talk) 14:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Friniate. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Andrea Hanks". VRT permission from Andrea Hanks needed. MKFI (talk) 08:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Also File:JoshuaLoyd (cropped).jpg. MKFI (talk) 08:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- I am the sole owner of this work and have authorized its release. The image is paid for and I own ownership rights to the image. Originally paid for to be used as a professional LinkedIn headshot for a business and network. IllinoisThirteen (talk) 01:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Furthermore, I have in writing the transfer of copyright ownership from the photographer. Photo performed in conjunction with TurningPoint USA and CPI IllinoisThirteen (talk) 01:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @IllinoisThirteen: since this is a work for hire image it is best that you send proof of the copyright authorization to VRT so Commons has a verification of the copyright. You can use Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator. MKFI (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
This might be {{PD-USGov-Military}} but it is not own work as claimed. MKFI (talk) 08:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like an Army created photo. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
found this on https://www.instagram.com/p/C1RzMP8tbu2/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== – no evidence that Fatush is Valeria Albinfo (talk) 16:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://desconocidatierradelsur.blogspot.com/2017/04/patagoniamagallanes-exposicion-mujeres.html Yann (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Undated old Chilean photograph, deleted per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- this is a mere allegation RevolutionaryAppreciator (talk) 04:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Commons:Copyright rules by territory/China is quite clear that no published photo created after 1945 is in the public domain in the US. This photo was created in 1967 and clearly published afterwards (the image in the source is clearly a scan). Günther Frager (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2063. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Needs permission if deemed above COM:TOO Turkmenistan which doesn't exist. Jonteemil (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Superseded/SVG available, File:AH WinterPark 4c.svg -αβοοδ (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- When I visited the Source URL listed at File:AdventHealth_Winter_Park_logo.png - https://www.adventhealth.com/hospital/adventhealth-winter-park - the logo my browser was served was the SVG I uploaded (with a width of 200 set in the img tag on the page). I am not sure where the PNG I am requesting for deletion actually came from, are there browsers that save SVG as raster/PNG by default? -αβοοδ (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: we can keep both raster and vector. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Creative work, almost certainly modern made, uploaded in 2006 by now-banned sock on enwiki Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Photo uncredited and lacking source information. Could be as late as 1936. Before Wikipedia it appeared in LA Times article (uncredited) 2002 or earlier. (See Brief History) Bastique ☎ let's talk! 20:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A 1936 image would have required copyright registration and renew that copyright. I cannot find any image of this description in either database. --RAN (talk) 02:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The photograph (without the added arrow) was published in 1956 in an article titled A History of the San Gabriel Mountains: Chapter III Life in the San Gabriels (Continued) by Charles Clark Vernon in The Historical Society of Southern California Quarterly (1956) 38 (3): 263–288, https://doi.org/10.2307/41169039, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41169039, specifically after page 264, as Rubio Canyon Incline, not dated and credited to the Will H. Thrall collection. There was no copyright notice in the journal as far as I can determine.
- I cannot tell if this was the first publication however. The Will H. Thrall collection is described as “This collection contains photographs, negatives, and some ephemera chiefly collected by California conservationist and editor William H. Thrall (1873-1963) for use in Trails magazine. The photographs primarily date from the 1930s, but also include copy prints (and some originals) of late 19th and early 20th photographs.” So the photograph is probably from the 1930s and might have been published before in this Trails magazine. I could not find either Trails or The Historical Society of Southern California Quarterly in First copyright renewals for periodicals. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The photo's first publication (in cropped form) was probably (though I have no definitive evidence) here on page 4 of the Winter 1935 (vol. 2, no. 1) issue of Trails Magazine. No direct photographer credit, but the magazine's masthead on the next page lists a Harlow A. R. Dormer as “official photographer”, so he might be the one who took the photograph. There is a copyright notice on page 2: “Entire contents copyrighted, 1934, by Mountain League of Southern California”. That notice might be defective because it does not include the copyright symbol ©, and apparently the copyright wasn't renewed anyway per the search at First copyright renewals for periodicals. --Rosenzweig τ 16:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, PD-US. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Not own work. US newspaper scans from 1947 (first three, International News Service, author James L. Kilgallen, died 1982) and 1984. Unsure how notice and renewal works with newspaper, the 1947 ones may be public domain, the 1984 one is unlikely to be.
- File:OniontownTownNameOrigin.jpg
- File:OniontownWhereNoOneSeemstoRaiseorSellOnions.jpg
- File:OniontownisTobaccoRoad.jpg
- File:PoughkeepsieJournalSunFeb121984.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The Buffalo News and the Poughkeepsie Journal did not renew any copyrights, so they expired that are prior to 1964. I looked at the masthead and the publishers paragraph and there are no copyright formalities used, that was required up 1989. --RAN (talk) 02:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: the two International News Service articles as they did not originate with in Buffalo News or Poughkeepsie Journal. Kept the other two per RAN. Only a 2003 book has a copyright registration under Poughkeepsie Journal. --Abzeronow (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
This image appears to be an artists impression of the arena, meaning that this image most likely is not the author's original work and is rather a rendering of the stadium before it was constructed. BullDawg2021 (talk) 03:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
This is the logo of a new company which uses the same name as Tabacalera (1945-1999). The new company is likely non-notable, and we shouldn't store the logos of non-notable companies. The logo of the old company is File:Logo Tabacalera.svg Polygnotus (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Registered picture at INPI Rems03338 (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jonteemil as Logo Borderline, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- COM:TOO Norway doesn't provide enough information to help us understand whether this logo is copyrighted or public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The dolfin looks pretty simple. The rest is text. Ruthven (msg) 19:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo PD-UKGov? Yann (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like the logo might pass UK's TOO, even if the crown in the middle classifies as PD-UKGov. Takipoint123 (💬) 02:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Kept: per Takipoint123. Ruthven (msg) 19:56, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
